Letter From The Founder

Causes of Pseudocyesis

Contact Us

Couvade Syndrome

Definitions of Pseudocyesis

Further Reading

History of Pseudocyesis

Objectives of the Foundation

Pseudocyesis in Mammals

Signs and Symptoms

Support Networks

Synonyms For Pseudocyesis

Treatment For Pseudocyesis

Wider Implications

Masters - Abstract

Masters - Introduction

Masters - Personal Interest

Masters - Chapter Overview

Masters - Literature Strategy

Masters - Prevelance

Masters - Current Research

Masters - The Menopause Theory

Masters - Chemiical Imbalance Theory

Masters - Differing Hypotheses

Masters - Research Approach

Masters - Phenomenological Approach

Masters - Data Collecting Methods

Masters - Phenomenological Interviews

Masters - Methods of Data Analysis

Masters - Recruiting Potential Interviewees

Masters - Ethical Framework

Masters - Limitations of the Study

Masters - Rigour

Masters - Findings

Masters - Research Participant One

Masters - Research Participant Two

Masters - Research Participant Three

Masters - Research Participant Four

Masters - Research Participant Five

Masters - Research Participant Six

Masters - Conclusion from Interviews

Masters - Results and Findings

Masters - Comparisons

Masters - Interpretations

Masters - Conclusions

Masters - Explanation of Conclusions

Masters - Reflections on Learning

Masters - Implications For Practice

E-Mail


 

Masters - Findings


 

In this chapter I will report the findings of the interviews that I carried out with nurses on their lived experience of treating patients with pseudocyesis. I will summarise the findings from each research participant individually and then in chapter six I will go on to compare and contrast those findings. I will use narrative inquiry (Clandinin & Connelly 2001) in reporting the findings of the interviews as I believe that this lends itself well to an interviewee reporting their lived experience. It also suits my personal academic background and writing style as I previously read for a BA (Hons) in Medieval and Renaissance History. Clandinin and Connelly also point to the fact in their chapter on Interviews that ‘there are many examples of interviews in narrative inquiry’ and cite an example of a qualitative interview extract from Enns-Connolly which demonstrates narrative inquiry. They also cite Mischler’s Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative (1986) as research that promotes the merits of carrying out narrative inquiry within qualitative interview settings.