Letter From The Founder

Causes of Pseudocyesis

Contact Us

Couvade Syndrome

Definitions of Pseudocyesis

Further Reading

History of Pseudocyesis

Objectives of the Foundation

Pseudocyesis in Mammals

Signs and Symptoms

Support Networks

Synonyms For Pseudocyesis

Treatment For Pseudocyesis

Wider Implications

Masters - Abstract

Masters - Introduction

Masters - Personal Interest

Masters - Chapter Overview

Masters - Literature Strategy

Masters - Prevelance

Masters - Current Research

Masters - The Menopause Theory

Masters - Chemiical Imbalance Theory

Masters - Differing Hypotheses

Masters - Research Approach

Masters - Phenomenological Approach

Masters - Data Collecting Methods

Masters - Phenomenological Interviews

Masters - Methods of Data Analysis

Masters - Recruiting Potential Interviewees

Masters - Ethical Framework

Masters - Limitations of the Study

Masters - Rigour

Masters - Findings

Masters - Research Participant One

Masters - Research Participant Two

Masters - Research Participant Three

Masters - Research Participant Four

Masters - Research Participant Five

Masters - Research Participant Six

Masters - Conclusion from Interviews

Masters - Results and Findings

Masters - Comparisons

Masters - Interpretations

Masters - Conclusions

Masters - Explanation of Conclusions

Masters - Reflections on Learning

Masters - Implications For Practice

E-Mail


 

Masters - Ethical Framework


 

In terms of the ethics of the study I wished to carry out, there was first and foremost a duty to ensure that any nurse or patient record that has been involved in the study had their right to privacy and dignity respected – therefore research participants will simply be referred to a Participant One through to Participant Six purely on the basis of the order that I interviewed them in. It was seen to that they were dealt with in a sensitive and caring manner. These objectives were met in several ways, for example by ensuring names were given anonymously and leaflet/pamphlet details of counselling services being made available to the participants should they feel the need to discuss these, at times traumatic, lived experiences further. There was also, I felt, a moral duty to investigate an illness that is not fully understood and is also therefore difficult to treat. Initiating study and opening up discussion in this area is important to the illness eventually being understood and becoming treatable. Patients who experience pseudocyesis deserve to be advocated for in this sense. There is a Middlesex University Ethics Review submitted and approved for the research that has been carried out in this study (see Appendix).