Letter From The Founder

Causes of Pseudocyesis

Contact Us

Couvade Syndrome

Definitions of Pseudocyesis

Further Reading

History of Pseudocyesis

Objectives of the Foundation

Pseudocyesis in Mammals

Signs and Symptoms

Support Networks

Synonyms For Pseudocyesis

Treatment For Pseudocyesis

Wider Implications

Masters - Abstract

Masters - Introduction

Masters - Personal Interest

Masters - Chapter Overview

Masters - Literature Strategy

Masters - Prevelance

Masters - Current Research

Masters - The Menopause Theory

Masters - Chemiical Imbalance Theory

Masters - Differing Hypotheses

Masters - Research Approach

Masters - Phenomenological Approach

Masters - Data Collecting Methods

Masters - Phenomenological Interviews

Masters - Methods of Data Analysis

Masters - Recruiting Potential Interviewees

Masters - Ethical Framework

Masters - Limitations of the Study

Masters - Rigour

Masters - Findings

Masters - Research Participant One

Masters - Research Participant Two

Masters - Research Participant Three

Masters - Research Participant Four

Masters - Research Participant Five

Masters - Research Participant Six

Masters - Conclusion from Interviews

Masters - Results and Findings

Masters - Comparisons

Masters - Interpretations

Masters - Conclusions

Masters - Explanation of Conclusions

Masters - Reflections on Learning

Masters - Implications For Practice

E-Mail


 

Masters - Phenomenological Interviews


 

Data collecting for this project was done solely through phenomenological interviews which each lasted approximately 60-90 minutes each. These interviews will be formed around one stand-alone open-ended question, namely: What is your lived experience of caring for women with pseudocyesis? This open-ended style of questioning is to facilitate the interviewee to express their thoughts and experiences of pseudocyesis within an unbiased atmosphere and not being directed towards certain conclusions by the interviewer (Lavrakas 2008). This unbiased atmosphere is crucial in learning of the lived experienced of the nurses involved in the research, so as to avoid learning of the interpreted experience instead. The open nature of the questioning style therefore is designed to reveal the subjective experience of the participants (Englander 2012). The participants for these interviews have been self-identified and therefore were open to approach by myself. These participants are individuals that I, as the researcher, have had no prior relationship with, professional or otherwise. The research relationship that the participant and I form has been respected in the ways set out in the Ethical Framework section of the Research Proposal for this dissertation. Once a participant had been successfully approached I, as the researcher, have then gained their written consent. The participants were given seventy two hours (three days) from the point of first contact to decide whether or not they wanted to take part in the research. Those participants that completed the research were then followed up by myself a fortnight later via whichever contact information they indicated in the Consent Form that they are happy for me to use (i.e. phone or e-mail) to clarify any outstanding points that came out in the interview.